Categories: Uncategorized

Why Every Manager Should Keep an Eye on Their Team’s Say-Do Ratio

TL;DR:

The Say-Do Ratio measures how often teams deliver on what they promise. It’s about building trust, realistic planning, and accountability. Low ratios erode morale, credibility, and innovation, while high ratios foster reliability, stronger collaboration, and better project delivery. Smart managers use Say-Do Rartio to coach teams, refine processes, and create cultures where promises matter and trust fuels performance.
The say-do ratio shows how often your team keeps its promises compared to how often they say they will. Smart managers keep an eye on this metric to identify areas where people aren’t being held accountable, gauge how a project will turn out, and foster cultures of high trust. Teams that keep their promises and do what they say they will do always do better than teams that promise too much and don’t deliver.
Your best developer says they will finish the authentication feature by Friday. When Monday comes, you find out they’re only halfway done. Does this sound familiar? You just saw a bad say-do ratio in action.
The say-do ratio isn’t just business talk; it’s what great managers use to get things done. This simple number shows the difference between what your team says they’ll do and what they actually do.

What Is the Say-Do Ratio, Anyway?

The say-do ratio is like a score for how reliable your team is. To get the answer, you divide the number of completed commitments by the total number of commitments made over a certain time. A ratio of 1.0 means that everything was done perfectly. Anything below shows where promises don’t match up with reality.
But this isn’t about micromanaging or catching people in lies. It’s about making a culture where promises are important and trust is what sets your team apart from the rest.

What is the psychology behind broken promises?

Why do smart, capable people always make promises they can’t keep? Behavioral psychology holds the key. We have an optimism bias that makes us think we can do more than we really can and that problems aren’t as bad as they are. When you add pressure to impress at work, you get a recipe for overcommitting.
Every team falls for the planning fallacy. That “quick” update to the website turns into a week-long journey through problems with browser compatibility that you didn’t expect. The “Easy” data migration shows years of technical debt that has built up. These aren’t flaws in character; they’re normal human behavior.
It’s very important to understand this psychology. When you keep track of say-do ratios, you’re not judging people; you’re helping them fine-tune their internal prediction engines. You’re teaching them to think about the things they don’t know that can mess up even the best plans.

Great things in business are never done by one person, they’re done by team of people

Steve Jobs

How bad Say-Do Ratios mess up team performance?

A low say-do ratio leads to a lot of problems that go beyond just missing deadlines. When promises are broken over and over again, team members lose trust in each other. People who have a stake in your team lose faith in its dependability. The worst thing that can happen is that team members start to doubt their own skills, which leads to a cycle of over-promising to make up for what they think they lack.
I’ve seen teams fall prey to this outcome. Instead of planning, meetings became times to make excuses. People on the team stopped making big promises because they were afraid of failing in front of others. Innovation died because everyone was too scared to try new things.
The costs on the outside are just as bad. Customers no longer trust delivery dates. Sales teams can’t make promises to potential customers with confidence. When one team consistently fails to meet its commitments, the whole organization’s credibility suffers.

What are the strengths, challenges, and best-fit environments for Accountable Performance Management?

Pros Cons
Builds trust & credibility Can feel rigid if overused
Creates clear commitments May limit flexibility in fast-changing projects
Strengthens accountability Risk of focusing too much on numbers
Provides measurable progress Needs context to avoid unfair judgment
Improves planning accuracy
Surfaces problems early
Boosts team confidence
Enhances cross-functional alignment

How the Ripple Effect Affects Team Morale

When team members can’t trust each other’s promises, they can’t work together. Projects get stuck waiting for dependencies that never show up. High achievers get angry when they have to deal with unreliable coworkers. In the end, your best people will look for places where promises are kept.

Your team’s Say-Do Ratio this week

Start tracking

How can we create a culture of trust?

Teams with strong say-do ratios work in a different way. They’ve learned to make fewer promises and think them through more. They make room for uncertainty. Most importantly, they’ve made it safe for people to talk openly about their limits and problems.
Follow Amazon’s example when it comes to promises. They’ve made “disagree and commit” a standard practice, but only after having a long talk about realistic deadlines. This stops people from making too many promises and from being stuck in endless debate.
High-performing teams are also adept at distinguishing between various types of commitments. A hard deadline for a client deliverable is different from an internal stretch goal. This small difference stops the all-or-nothing way of thinking that often makes it hard to be accountable.

How to Keep Track of and Improve Your Team’s Say-Do Ratio

  • Begin with the basics. At your weekly team meetings, write down the promises that were made and check off the ones that were kept. Don’t worry too much about the math at first; just work on making a habit of making decisions with your mind.
  • Make a commitment log that has these things
    • What was done
    • When it was due
    • Who did it
    • Status of completion
    • Things that made delivery easier or harder
  • The review sessions are where the magic happens. You can find systemic problems by looking at patterns over time. Maybe Friday commitments always fail because people aren’t really there. Maybe commitments that depend on things outside of your control need more time.
  • Consider transforming your team meetings into ceremonies of commitment. When someone makes a promise, ask them to be clear about what success looks like and what might get in the way. This simple habit makes people more likely to follow through by making commitments more real and thought out.
  • Celebrate improvements in say-do ratios as much as you do when projects are done. Recognition encourages the behavior you want to see more of.

How the Manager Can Help Say-Do Work

  • You shouldn’t be the commitment police; you should be the commitment coach. If someone has trouble with their say-do ratio all the time, look into it more. Are they doing too much because they don’t want to let you down? Could they benefit from further developing their skills to more accurately estimate the time required for a task? Are things outside of their control getting in the way of their work?
  • Be a good example of saying and doing what you say. When you promise your team something, keep track of how well you follow through and let them know. Nothing hurts this project more than managers who talk about being responsible but don’t keep their own promises.
  • Make room for open talks about capacity. The best managers help their teams say “no” to requests that aren’t realistic instead of saying yes to everything and then failing.
  • More than just the numbers: Being reliable to build trust. The main goal isn’t to have perfect say-do ratios; it’s to build a team where trust flows freely and commitments matter. Things get better when people know they can trust each other. Planning gets more precise. Less stress. Innovation goes up because people feel safe taking smart risks

This isn’t about making people afraid to make commitments. It’s about making a culture of thoughtfulness, where people make promises with care and keep them.

Ready to boost execution discipline?

Try Profit.co

Frequently Asked Questions

Add extra time to estimates and keep track of these outside blockers separately. The goal is to find patterns and make better predictions, not to punish people for things they can’t control.

Start by looking at metrics at the team level. Individual tracking can be helpful for coaching conversations, but it should stay private to keep people safe mentally.

This is not a bug; it’s a feature. Teams that promise to do things and then do them build more trust and momentum than teams that promise too much and don’t follow through. Encourage stretch goals that are not tied to promised deliverables.
Share
shamli.s@profit.co

Published by
shamli.s@profit.co

Recent Posts

How Say-Do Ratio Ensures Projects Stay on Track and On Time

TL;DR: The Say-Do Ratio (SDR) measures how often teams deliver on their commitments, making it…

2 hours ago

Performance Management Archetypes Explained: Which Type Does Your Company Actually Use?

Reviews of work are coming up. People who work at Company A worry about their…

2 hours ago

What is Say-Do Ratio? A Complete Guide to Accountability in Teams

Have you ever had a coworker who says they will deliver by Friday but then…

3 hours ago

How Does Technology Turn Performance Reviews Into Dynamic Performance Management?

TL;DR The four main technologies that underpin dynamic performance management are automated feedback systems that…

3 hours ago

Profit.co Recognized in the 2025 Constellation ShortList™ for Performance Management Platforms

At Profit.co, we are thrilled to announce our inclusion in the 2025 Constellation ShortList™ for…

2 days ago

How to Choose the Right Performance Management System for Your Organization in 2025

Performance reviews Just the phrase makes some managers roll their eyes and employees check their…

2 days ago