TL;DR:
The Say-Do Ratio measures how often teams deliver on what they promise. It’s about building trust, realistic planning, and accountability. Low ratios erode morale, credibility, and innovation, while high ratios foster reliability, stronger collaboration, and better project delivery. Smart managers use Say-Do Rartio to coach teams, refine processes, and create cultures where promises matter and trust fuels performance.
The say-do ratio shows how often your team keeps its promises compared to how often they say they will. Smart managers keep an eye on this metric to identify areas where people aren’t being held accountable, gauge how a project will turn out, and foster cultures of high trust. Teams that keep their promises and do what they say they will do always do better than teams that promise too much and don’t deliver.
Your best developer says they will finish the authentication feature by Friday. When Monday comes, you find out they’re only halfway done. Does this sound familiar? You just saw a bad say-do ratio in action.
The say-do ratio isn’t just business talk; it’s what great managers use to get things done. This simple number shows the difference between what your team says they’ll do and what they actually do.
What Is the Say-Do Ratio, Anyway?
The say-do ratio is like a score for how reliable your team is. To get the answer, you divide the number of completed commitments by the total number of commitments made over a certain time. A ratio of 1.0 means that everything was done perfectly. Anything below shows where promises don’t match up with reality.
But this isn’t about micromanaging or catching people in lies. It’s about making a culture where promises are important and trust is what sets your team apart from the rest.
What is the psychology behind broken promises?
Why do smart, capable people always make promises they can’t keep? Behavioral psychology holds the key. We have an optimism bias that makes us think we can do more than we really can and that problems aren’t as bad as they are. When you add pressure to impress at work, you get a recipe for overcommitting.
Every team falls for the planning fallacy. That “quick” update to the website turns into a week-long journey through problems with browser compatibility that you didn’t expect. The “Easy” data migration shows years of technical debt that has built up. These aren’t flaws in character; they’re normal human behavior.
It’s very important to understand this psychology. When you keep track of say-do ratios, you’re not judging people; you’re helping them fine-tune their internal prediction engines. You’re teaching them to think about the things they don’t know that can mess up even the best plans.
Great things in business are never done by one person, they’re done by team of people