It’s annoying, isn’t it? The damage is much worse than just missing a deadline. Your say-do ratio is broken, and it’s quietly hurting trust, slowing down work, and changing the culture of your team in ways that most organizations don’t even measure.
TLDR;
The say-do ratio measures how consistently people deliver on their commitments. While it matters everywhere, its impact varies dramatically across different work environments. Remote teams need it for trust, agile teams for sprint reliability, sales teams for client confidence, and leaders for organizational credibility. High say-do ratios correlate with better collaboration, higher revenue, and stronger execution. This post breaks down how to apply this concept across nine different work contexts.What Is the Say-Do Ratio?
The say-do ratio is the relationship between what you commit to doing and what you actually do. Think of it as your reliability score. A high say-do ratio means people can count on you. A low one means your words lose value over time.While this concept matters everywhere, it plays out very differently depending on where you work and what you do. Let’s explore how the say-do ratio shapes performance across different contexts.
Remote Teams Run on Trust
Working from home changed the way we work together in every way. Without those quick desk check-ins or hallway conversations, teams that work from different places depend almost entirely on written commitments and updates that happen at different times. This makes the say-do ratio very important.Studies show that remote teams with a high say-do reliability are 60% more satisfied with working together. Why? You have to believe that someone is doing what they said they would do when you can’t see them working.
Remote teams can improve their say-do ratios by focusing on a few important things.
- First, divide your commitments into smaller time slots. Instead of saying, “I’ll have this done next week,” say, “I’ll send you the first draft by Wednesday at 2 p.m.”
- Second, put agreements in writing. Your email and Slack messages become your way of holding yourself accountable.
- Third, when setting deadlines, make sure to take time zones into account.
- And finally, send regular updates that aren’t in real time so people know what’s going on without having to track you down.
Remote Teams Run on Trust
In agile settings, you can actually measure the say-do ratio. Sprint reliability is the name for this. It shows how well teams can predict what they’ll deliver. Teams that always meet their sprint commitments aren’t just good at making estimates; they’re also showing that they know how to plan and carry out their work. When developers say, “We’ll finish these five user stories this sprint,” and then do it, trust builds over time.- Sprint commitment accuracy tracking
- User story completion rates
- Retrospective action item follow-through
- Cross-team dependency management
Agile teams can keep track of their say-do ratio by looking at how accurate their sprint commitments are, how many user stories they finish, and maybe most importantly, whether they actually do the things they said they would do in the retrospective.
Sales Teams Run on Revenue Targets
The say-do ratio has a direct effect on sales for salespeople. Put yourself in the buyer’s shoes. When a salesperson says they will send pricing by tomorrow and then does, it makes you trust them more. When they say they’ll get their technical team involved and then disappear for a week, it makes you lose trust. Buyers are basically asking themselves, “What will happen after I sign if this person can’t follow through during the sales process?”- Client follow-up commitment completion
- Proposal deadline adherence
- Meeting attendance reliability
- Internal process compliance
Sales teams should keep an eye on whether clients follow up, whether proposals are submitted on time, whether meetings are attended, and whether internal processes are followed. These aren’t just nice-to-haves; they are signs of how quickly deals are moving and how likely they are to close.
Start tracking commitments, check-ins, and outcomes
Leadership Teams Set the Standard
Your team is watching everything a leader does. When leaders make promises and then don’t keep them, they not only break their own say-do ratio, but they also show that promises don’t really matter.- Engagement
- Psychological safety
- Execution culture
- Organizational confidence
You can tell if leaders are responsible by whether the action items from leadership meetings get done, whether strategic priorities stay the same or change with the wind, and whether decisions match what was said inside the company. When leaders keep a high say-do ratio, they make cultures where doing things is just as important as saying them.

Cross-Functional Teams Causing Domino Effect
Cross-functional work is where the most damage happens when people don’t follow through on what they say. When marketing promises creative assets by Friday so that the product can go live on Monday, and those assets don’t show up on time or at all, the whole launch falls apart.- Smooth vs delayed handoffs
- Trust between departments
- SLA adherence
A broken promise from one team becomes a blocker for another team. Cross-functional teams care so much about SLA adherence, dependency reliability, and the quality of handoffs because of this. A strong say-do ratio isn’t just about being responsible; it’s also about understanding how work is connected in modern times.
Predictability in Project Management Teams
For project and program managers, the say-do ratio becomes the difference between stakeholder confidence and constant firefighting. When planned delivery dates consistently match actual delivery dates, trust builds. When every milestone shifts and every estimate proves optimistic, credibility erodes- Track planned vs. actual delivery variance
- Monitor milestone completion reliability
- Review the frequency of change requests
- Evaluate how stable the RAG status remains across reporting cycles
Smart project teams track planned versus actual delivery variance, milestone completion reliability, the frequency of change requests, and how stable their RAG status remains across reporting cycles. These metrics tell the story of whether a team can be trusted to deliver what they promise.
“Great things in business are never done by one person . They’re done by a team of people.”
Customer Success Teams Promise Counts
Every Promise Counts for Customer Success. People who pay your salary judge your say-do ratio when you work with customers. When you say “I’ll call you back in two hours” or “We’ll have this fixed by the end of the day,” your customer believes you.- Strong renewal rates
- Higher NPS scores
- Fewer escalations overall
- Callback adherence consistency
- SLA compliance levels
- Faster ticket resolution
- Customer-rated reliability
Customer success teams that have a high say-do ratio get more people to renew their subscriptions, get better NPS scores, and have fewer problems. This can be seen in callback adherence, SLA compliance, ticket resolution timelines, and customer-reported reliability scores. Your customers see when you follow through and when you don’t.
Operations and HR Teams Rely on Consistency
Both operations and HR teams are the backbone of organizational consistency. When these functions have low say-do ratios, chaos spreads- Recruiting timelines
- Audit cycles
- Issue resolution
- Policy rollouts
For operations, reliability appears in audit adherence, recurring task completion, and crisis response times. For HR, it shows up in recruiting timeline predictability, policy rollout timing, and employee request follow-through. These teams set the rhythm for how the entire organization operates.
How Does It All Matter to Strategy Execution?
At the highest level, the say-do ratio becomes the gap between what companies say they’ll do and what actually happens. How many OKRs get completed? Do quarterly commitments become actual outcomes? Is there consistency between what’s announced and what’s delivered?High-performing companies demonstrate reliable follow-through on key results, quarterly commitments, and strategy reviews. They build cultures where following through on those goals is non-negotiable.
The Bottom Line
The say-do ratio isn’t about perfection. Life happens, priorities shift, and sometimes commitments need to change. But there’s a big difference between being open about changing your commitments from time to time and always overpromising and underdelivering. Whether you’re working remotely, shipping code, closing deals, leading teams, or supporting customers, your say-do ratio is either building trust or eroding it. The question isn’t whether it matters—it’s whether you’re measuring it and actively working to improve it. Your reputation is based on how reliable you are in the end. And your reputation determines what you’re able to accomplish.Want to boost team reliability and strategic execution?
While there’s no universal benchmark, teams performing in the top quartile typically maintain an 85% or higher say-do ratio, meaning they deliver on at least 85% of their commitments. However, context matters; missing a client deadline is different than adjusting an internal milestone.
Start by tracking your commitments for two weeks. Write down every promise you make with a deadline. Then review which ones you completed on time, which required renegotiation, and which you simply dropped. Your completion rate is your say-do ratio.
Start with yourself. Model the behavior you want to see by being impeccable with your own commitments. Then, if you’re in a position to influence the process, introduce lightweight accountability mechanisms like written commitments, public dashboards, or retrospectives focused on reliability.
Absolutely. In fact, this is one of the most powerful strategies. A high say-do ratio on fewer commitments builds more trust than a low ratio on many commitments. Quality over quantity applies to promises too.
Focus on outcomes rather than activity. Use shared documents where people note their commitments publicly, then review completion rates at regular intervals. The key is transparency without surveillance—people should want to improve their ratio because it builds trust, not because they’re being watched.
Yes, but differently. For creative roles, the commitment might be “I’ll share three concepts by Friday” rather than “I’ll complete the final design.” The key is making commitments at an appropriate level of specificity for the work type, then honoring those commitments.
Adaptability involves transparent renegotiation when circumstances change. A low say-do ratio involves ghosting on commitments or consistently over-promising. The former maintains trust through communication; the latter destroys it through silence.
Related Articles
-
How the Say-Do Ratio Helps Measure Commitment in Agile Teams
Agile teams live on a steady diet of promises and proof. At sprint planning the promise is made, and at... Read more
-
Why focusing on HRIS performance alone hurts the business
For years, people thought that performance management was an HR job, with forms, ratings, and systems made to make sure... Read more
-
Why the Say-Do Ratio of Your Team Is More Important Than You Think
The say-do ratio of your team, or how well people follow through on what they say, is the best indicator... Read more
-
16 Employee Engagement Metrics Every HR Leader Should Track
Employee engagement is not just a buzzword tossed around in boardrooms anymore. It’s now become a true indicator of organizational... Read more
