To put this into practice, Hoshin Kanri breaks down strategy into four key levels, or “corners,” each serving a distinct purpose. Understanding these layers helps ensure that every initiative and KPI directly supports the outcomes your organization wants to achieve.
Below is a clear, implementation-oriented summary of how cascading actually works, grounded in the distinctions that matter in day-to-day use. It clearly defines the difference between outcomes and efforts.
The Four Corners (X1–X4) Explained
- X1 – Direction: Long-term intent (3–5 years). The North Star that doesn’t “move down” the organization. It anchors everything
- X2 – Annual Outcomes: What must be true by year-end? Think of results you can verify with a metric
- X3 – Initiatives/Efforts: The projects and workstreams that create those results
- X4 – KPIs/Targets: The measures and thresholds that prove the X2 outcomes were achieved.
Now that we understand what each corner represents, let’s see how these layers cascade from the corporate level down to departments. This is where the strategy becomes tangible, translating top-level intent into department-level action while maintaining alignment and accountability
The Core Cascade (Corporate → Department)
Here’s how strategy flows from the top of the company down to departments:- Corporate X1 (breakthrough direction) anchors the year.
- Corporate X2 (annual outcomes) is set to advance X1
- Each Corporate X2 becomes a Department X1 (the department’s owned contribution to the corporate outcome).
- The department then defines:
- Department X2 = department-level annual outcomes that make Department X1 real
- Department X3 = initiatives the department will run (often decomposed from corporate cross-functional programs).
- Department X4 = KPIs/targets that verify the X2 outcomes and roll up logically to corporate KPIs
Important clarification (the part most teams get wrong)
- Corporate X3 does not become Department X2. Corporate X3 is an enterprise program (effort). These typically decompose into Department X3 workstreams. Department X2 must stay as outcomes (what must be true by year-end inside that department).
The worked example below shows exactly how a single corporate outcome can cascade into department-level goals and initiatives while maintaining alignment and clear metrics.
“Our goals can only be reached through the vehicle of a plan . There is no other to route to success.”
Worked Example (Manufacturing + Marketing)
To achieve the big goal for the year. Every department needs to understand what they can do to help. This is how the Hoshin Kanri “cascade” works.Step 1: Corporate Goals
- Corporate X1 (3–5 yr): Be the #1 eco-friendly packaging provider in North America
- Corporate X2 (this year): Reduce company carbon footprint by 20%; achieve 50% recycled inputs.
- Corporate X3 (programs):
- Enterprise Energy-Efficiency Program
- Recycled Supplier Transition
Step 2: Manufacturing Department
- Dept X1 (child of corp X2): Cut production energy use by 15% this year
- Dept X2 (dept outcomes):
- Reduce kWh per unit from 0.82 → 0.70 by Q4
- Increase the recycled resin share in line output to 35%
- Achieve 98% first-pass yield (reduce rework energy loss)
- Dept X3 (initiatives, decomposed from corporate programs):
- A1) VFD retrofits & compressor optimization on lines 1–3
- A2) Lean changeovers to shrink idle/heat-up time
- B1) Qualify two recycled suppliers; PPAP three SKUs
- Dept X4 (KPIs): kWh/unit, % recycled resin, FPY, CO₂e/ton (with quarterly targets).
These KPIs roll up to the corporate carbon and recycled-input goals.
Step 3: Marketing Department
- Dept X1 (child of corp X2): Position brand as sustainability leader.
- Dept X2 (dept outcomes):
- Lift eco-brand perception score +8 pts
- Attribute 25% of pipeline to sustainability messaging
- Publish audited sustainability report by Q3
- Dept X3 (initiatives):
- Launch multi-channel eco-campaigns tied to verified carbon reductions
- Customer stories on recycled-input SKUs
- Sustainability report production & third-party assurance
- Dept X4 (KPIs): Brand perception, attributed pipeline %, report completion & certification
Note how both departments translated the same Corporate X2 into their own X1, then created their X2 outcomes and X3 efforts they control, while keeping metric roll-ups clean.
| Level | Manufacturing | Marketing |
|---|---|---|
| X1 (Dept contribution) | Cut production energy use by 15% | Position the brand as a sustainability leader |
| X2 (Dept outcomes) | Reduce kWh/unit, increase recycled resin, 98% FPY | Lift eco-brand score +8 pts, 25% pipeline from sustainability, audit report by Q3 |
| X3 (Initiatives) | VFD retrofits, lean changeovers, and qualify recycled suppliers | Multi-channel eco campaigns, customer stories, and sustainability report |
| X4 (KPIs) | kWh/unit, % recycled resin, FPY, CO₂e/ton | Brand perception, pipeline %, report completion & certification |
Note how both departments translated the same Corporate X2 into their own X1, then created their X2 outcomes and X3 efforts they control, while keeping metric roll-ups clean.
Step 4: Important Points in a split (fan-out) cascade
- Corporate X2 does NOT become Department X1 word-for-word.
- Instead, the corporate outcome splits into department goals (Department X1s), so each department owns its part of the outcome
- Departments then create their X2 outcomes, X3 initiatives, and X4 KPIs based on their sphere of control
- This ensures alignment while keeping metrics clear and actionable.
What happens is a split (fan-out) cascade: a single enterprise outcome (Corporate X2) is decomposed into several department-owned objectives (Department X1s) that reflect each function’s sphere of control. Those department X1s may be different in wording and scope, but together they are designed to deliver the corporate outcome.
Step 5: How to think about it
| Level | What it means | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate X2 | Enterprise outcome (what must be true by year-end) | Reduce the company’s carbon footprint by 20% |
| Department X1 | Department-owned contribution to corporate outcome | Cut production energy use by 15% |
| Department X2 | Department outcomes (measurable results) | kWh/unit, recycled resin %, FPY |
| Department X3 | Initiatives/projects | Upgrade machines, lean changeovers |
| Department X4 | KPIs / metrics | kWh/unit, FPY, CO₂ emissions |
Every department translates the corporate goal into its own objectives, while still supporting the company’s overall targets.

With the departmental cascade in place, the next step is to decide how each department contributes to the corporate outcome. Some departments have a direct impact, others act as proxies, and some provide enabling capabilities. Here are the three common fan-out patterns and how they map to our example.
The three common fan-out patterns
- Direct numeric allocation (best when the math can sum up): The department directly controls a numeric driver of the corporate outcome. The sum of department contributions adds up to the corporate KPI.The company wants to cut CO₂ by 20%. Manufacturing can handle 12%, Logistics 5%, and Facilities 3%. Each becomes that function’s Dept X1 (“Cut plant CO₂e by 12%”), with Dept X2 targets/KPIs that roll up cleanly.
- Proxy outcome mapping (when the function influences the driver indirectly): Sometimes a department can’t directly change the number, but it can influence something that affects the outcome. Example: Marketing can’t reduce CO₂ directly. Instead, it works on things that drive adoption of recycled products: For example, “Grow eco-SKU revenue mix to 40%” or “Generate 25% of pipeline from sustainability messaging.” These proxies correlate with higher recycled-input adoption and thus support Corporate X2.
- Enabler objectives (capability pre-requisites): Other departments provide capabilities or tools that help the outcome owners succeed. IT, HR, Finance may own enablers (e.g., “Deploy energy data platform to all plants by Q2”); these are still Dept X1 items but measured via enabler KPIs (coverage, cycle time, system accuracy) that unlock the outcome owners
The Main Idea: So, when a corporate goal cascades down:
- Some departments move the needle directly.
- Some influence it indirectly through proxies.
- Some make it possible by providing tools or capabilities.
No matter which way, each department sets Dept X2 outcomes (what must be achieved) and Dept X3 initiatives (the projects or actions they will take). The corporate goal is never handed down word-for-word, it’s split into pieces that each team can actually own and deliver.
Apply it to the above example
- Corporate X2: “Reduce company carbon footprint by 20%; achieve 50% recycled inputs.”
- Manufacturing Dept X1 (owned contribution): “Cut production energy use by 15% this year.” (direct driver of CO₂)
- Marketing Dept X1 (proxy contribution): “Position brand as sustainability leader” is OK narratively, but stronger if stated as a proxy outcome that can roll up. For example, “Increase eco-SKU share of bookings to 40% and +8pt eco-brand score.” Now Marketing’s KPIs (Dept X4) influence recycled-input adoption and reinforce Corporate X2.
Rule of thumb
- If a department controls a numeric driver of the enterprise outcome → give it a direct, numeric Dept X1 (pattern 1).
- If it influences adoption or demand → give it a proxy Dept X1 with tight linkage (pattern 2).
- If it builds capability → use an enabler Dept X1 with completion/quality KPIs (pattern 3).
- In all cases, Department X2 = outcomes (auditable by year-end), and Department X3 = efforts (projects).
- promote efforts to achieve outcomes.
So, Corporate X2 “split-cascades” into multiple, department-specific X1s that are related (sometimes directly, sometimes via proxies or enablers), rather than being a word-for-word handoff. The quality test is whether the sum of department X2 KPIs (direct + proxy + enabler effects) naturally explains progress on the corporate KPI.
Learn how Profit.co’s OKR software can help you cascade corporate goals, align departments, and track outcomes in real time
Governance: Catchball, Ownership, and Roll-ups
When corporate goals cascade to departments, it’s important to have rules to keep things clear and accountable.1. Catchball: Two-Way Feedback
- Every step in the cascade is checked in both directions
- Top-down: Leadership clarifies the goal
- Bottom-up: Teams test if it’s realistic given capacity, budget, and resources.
- This is where Department X1 and X2 are discussed, negotiated, and finalized.
2. Ownership Model
- Dept X2 outcomes: Each has one owner who is accountable, plus supporters who help.
- Dept X3 initiatives: Each has a project owner and a team.
- Avoid “co-owning” outcomes; it’s confusing. Use supporters instead.
3. Roll-Up Logic
- Dept X4 KPIs should naturally roll up to corporate X4.
- If the numbers don’t add up, you’ve probably mixed outcomes and efforts
Cadence & PDCA
Now that everyone knows their responsibilities and the goals are clear, it’s time to put the plan into action. PDCA gives your team a simple rhythm to plan, track, review, and adjust work so nothing falls through the cracks| Cadence & PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Step | Cadence | What to do |
| Plan | Q0 / Q1 | Set X1–X4 for corporate & departments; complete catchball; freeze baselines |
| Do | Weekly | Work on X3 initiatives; update leading indicators |
| Check | Monthly | Review KPIs; root-cause analysis; re-prioritize X3 if needed |
| Act | Quarterly | Double down on successful initiatives; pivot if assumptions change; adjust targets; manage dependencies and capacity |
| Following PDCA ensures that strategy execution is continuous, measurable, and flexible. | ||
With PDCA in place, teams now have a clear rhythm for planning, executing, reviewing, and adjusting work. But before we get into weekly or monthly check-ins, it’s important to understand how department-level outcomes (Department X2) are created.
This step ensures that initiatives (X3) and KPIs (X4) are built on solid, measurable outcomes, rather than starting with projects and risking effort without results.
How Department X2 Emerges (Step-by-Step)
- Start with Department X1 (the department’s owned slice of corporate X2).
- Convert it into measurable annual outcomes (Department X2) the department can prove by year-end.
- Use one of: level, delta, rate, mix, quality, time (or a combination).
- Stress-test X2 against constraints (budget, headcount, lead times).
- Only then design Department X3 (initiatives) to achieve those outcomes.
- Define Department X4 (KPIs) with baselines, targets, and review cadence.
Pro Tip: Sequence discipline matters. If you pick X3 (projects) first, you’ll optimize effort, not outcomes.
Cross-Functional Work Without Confusion
Once departments have defined their X2 outcomes, the next challenge is handling corporate programs that span multiple teams. These cross-functional initiatives (Corporate X3) can be tricky, but breaking them down clearly keeps everyone aligned. Corporate may launch a cross-functional X3 (program). Each department creates child X3 workstreams under it and sets its Department X2 outcomes that the program must deliver locallyExample:
- Corporate X3: Energy Program
- Manufacturing Dept X3: Plant-level retrofits
- Manufacturing Dept X2: kWh/unit, CO₂e reductions
This approach ensures that everyone knows their role, and each department’s metrics roll up cleanly to the corporate goals
To make it easy to visualize, here’s a mapping cheat-sheet showing how corporate goals flow into department objectives, initiatives, and KPIs.
Mapping Cheat-Sheet
| Layer | Purpose | Owned by | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate X1 | 3–5yr direction | Exec team | “#1 eco-friendly provider” |
| Corporate X2 | Annual outcomes | Exec owners | “-20% CO₂”, “50% recycled inputs |
| Corporate X3 | Enterprise programs | Program leads | Energy efficiency, supplier transition |
| Corporate X4 | Enterprise KPIs | FP&A / Ops | CO₂e, % recycled, margin, NPS |
| Dept X1 | Child objective (from corp X2) | Dept head | “Cut production energy 15%” |
| Dept X2 | Dept annual outcomes | Dept head | “kWh/unit 0.70”, “FPY 98%” |
| Dept X3 | Dept workstreams | Project owners | VFD retrofits, PPAPs |
| Dept X4 | Dept KPIs/targets | Dept ops | kWh/unit by line, FPY, resin % |
Golden rule: Corporate X2 → Department X1. Corporate X3 → Department X3 (decomposed).
Never elevate Corporate X3 (effort) into Department X2 (outcome).
After defining ownership and outcomes, it’s time to figure out which initiatives matter most and where each department should focus, alignment strength and prioritization.
Alignment Strength & Prioritization (Optional but Useful)
- Use weights to signal where an initiative has the largest impact or where a department is primary vs. supporting.
- Keep a simple triage: Impact, Accountability, Complexity (I/A/C) scored to guide capacity allocation
Common Failure Modes & Fixes
| Aspect | Symptom | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Confusing outcomes vs efforts | Many “launched” projects, weak metrics | Make X2 measurable; move verbs like “install, deploy, launch” to X3 |
| Co-owned outcomes | Everyone helps; no one is accountable | Assign a single X2 owner; others as supporters |
| Bad roll-ups | Dept metrics don’t add to corporate targets | Redesign X4 so the math is natural (e.g., weighted metrics like kWh/unit by plant) |
| Capacity overload | Too many X3s, thin progress | Set WIP limits; re-prioritize quarterly; pause or kill low-impact work |
Implementation Checklist (use this in your next planning cycle)
- Corporate X1 (3–5yr) refreshed; no more than 3–5 breakthroughs.
- Corporate X2 (annual) are numeric and auditable.
- Catchball round 1: translate each Corporate X2 into Department X1
- Departments propose X2 (outcomes), X3 (efforts), X4 (KPIs) with baselines/targets
- Catchball round 2: stress-test feasibility, roll-ups, and capacity; finalize.
- Lock owners: one owner per X2; supporters documented
- Cadence set: weekly X3 reviews; monthly KPI checks; quarterly PDCA
- WIP limit: kill or pause low-leverage X3s; protect critical ones
- Dashboard hygiene: corporate KPIs auto-roll from department KPIs.
Final Takeaway
If you remember just three things:- Corporate X2 → Department X1 (that’s the cascade backbone).
- Department X2 are outcomes; Department X3 are efforts. Don’t mix them.
- KPIs (X4) must add up naturally from departments to corporate—if the math is awkward, your cascade is off
Turn strategy into measurable results and ensure every department contributes to corporate objectives effortlessly
Yes. That’s the cleanest mapping. Corporate annual outcomes become each department’s owned objective for the year
Department X2 are the department’s annual outcomes, the measurable results that, if achieved, prove the Department X1 objective was delivered.
No. Corporate X3 is an effort. It decomposes into Department X3 workstreams. Department X2 must remain outcomes (auditable, metric-based).
KPIs exist at every level, X4 for corporate, department, and team goals. Department KPIs are designed to roll up naturally to corporate KPIs, so you don’t need special spreadsheets or complicated calculations to track alignment.
Keep one corporate program (X3) with a named owner. Each department creates child X3, sets its own X2 outcomes, and reports its X4. Use supporters to reflect collaboration, not co-ownership of outcomes.
Yes. Treat Objectives ≈ X1/X2 (direction/outcome) and Key Results ≈ X4 (measures). Keep Initiatives/Projects ≈ X3. The “don’t mix outcomes and efforts” rule is the same.
Related Articles
-
Strategic Planning vs. Operational Planning: Understanding the Difference
Every successful organization relies on both a clear vision of the future and a disciplined approach to making that vision... Read more
-
One Execution View for OKR and Balanced Scorecard Integration
TL;DR Companies don't have to choose between OKRs and Balanced Scorecard; they work better together. OKRs help set big goals... Read more
-
Do You Really Need to Choose Between OKRs and Balanced Scorecards?
We have seen this happen in dozens of groups, and it's always the same. You say that you're going to... Read more
-
How the Balanced Scorecard Helps Government Agencies Better Serve the Public
TL;DR Government agencies have to deal with a lot of different problems, like serving a wide range of stakeholders with... Read more
